Reviews

• gamedeal user

  Jan 22, 2017

  Very fun game!
• gamedeal user

  Jan 22, 2017

  This game is awesome
• gamedeal user

  Jan 25, 2017

  dont ever hope for a password reset, their system doesnt even recognise that it reset it. solid.
• gamedeal user

  Feb 3, 2017

  Pretty Good.
• gamedeal user

  Feb 9, 2017

  I don't recommend this game.For several reasons. 1.This is a potential game. But it is an online game.You need to register and log in just for the singleplayer.This might not be an apparante fault,but consider once the server's closed, you can't play forever, and we'd have no way knowing when they will close it.And once that's happened your ships are lost forever.I can't play knowing my playability is in other's hand. I used to host a private Minecraft Bukket server and i had to stop it. Those who played on it were very sad. I don't want it to all happen again. =====================EDIT======================================= Since the devs have kindly responded, I probably should have elaborated on my point. My point is: a_that this game could be developed for a better single player experience,with player fighting ai and don't need to connect to the internet to play,(for example during bad internet service which is all the time where i live) and that b_this game developer chose not to do it, out of their idea for a multiplayer-focused game. I fully respect their choice of doing so, which surely helps with DMR and management. Yet Homeworld was a good game and people enjoyed both its MP and its SP. Its great MP didn't stop it from being a good SP game, and vice versa .What i mean is that IMHO building a good MP game does not mean that you need to sacrifice SP or make it Always-Online.Espeicially since the later can be exploited (to let the players bail the game out for example) i would much like to see it be truly SP/No-net-capable, precisely because i think the game mechanics are creative, although having some problems, as elaborated below, in my old review. ================================================================= 2.The game lacks long-term playability. When you've beaten all the ships you actually wins this game. I mean , for example ,look up Reassembly.It's the same genere but it is an open-world where you can get all kinds of encounters and play for domination. YOU ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING. But Istrolid simply lets you win/lose a game without much of the bigger picture. 3.This game's players seems to utilize specially-crafted ships for purpose of defeating others.While i admire their creativity, I might also suggest that this approach forces others to develop counter approach vehicles that's equally massive. In the end itis a game of LET'S BUILD THE TITAN AND BE DONE WITH IT. This game's design deprives the players of the freedom to play their style 4.Graphics.The battles are dull without much excitement(graphically). Like Starsector, when you have a Paragon(Tri-Tachyon BB)and fire everything at another BB IT LOOKS GORGEOUSE. Watch some vids and get an impression and you will see how these two games compare. Also see Reassemby. When you fight fights in Reassembly you get an impression of really in space----engines smoking,plasma flying,missiles shooting everywhere--which istrolid lacks in all respective. 5.Plausiability.Why the HELL would anyone want to put two ships and destroy eachother? And how are they manufactued? IS there a way resource is collected? And do people really die in these battles? These are all questions that requires answering. in other words the game lacks in background.Other games lets you fill in the blanks(ie,Reassembly)but i feel hard-pressed to fill in the blanks when i have so cartoonic starships flying around. 6.Physics. How are those ships turned without an RCS and what does those damn wings do and why are there no repulse when i fire those damn cannons?why does my bullet lacks stopping power? amd why am i slowing down in mid space? (Okay i have to admit that except point 1 i could have got along with all those problems.) So in all my advice is look around and see if there's other games in this genere you like and compare before you start serious playing. BECAUSE THIS ISN'T THE BEST GAME OF this GENERE IMHO.Unless the devs give us the server files.InThatCase i will certainly reconsider my review. EDIT:Oh FOGOT ABOUT THE DAMN PAID DLC.DAMN EXPENSIVE AND WHAT, JUST FOR ROTATING BLOCKS?MIGHT AS WELL BUY REASSEMBLY.
• gamedeal user

  Feb 24, 2017

  omg... what is this game.... i dont get it.... you build a ship with no instruction.... and you fight... and there are so much levels... i really dont get this game... 2/10
• gamedeal user

  Feb 24, 2017

  Tried this game out a few days ago, and I've found it one of the most interesting RTS game I've played in awhile. Very simple premise, easy to get into. Yet difficult to master. It exemplifies the concept of simplicity. The developers are definitely onto something great here. Would be nice to have a focused set of gameplay types, but I've been rocking out playing the campaign and pvp battles.
• gamedeal user

  Nov 22, 2020

  awesome game. saw video's of people playing it. I was immediately hooked. The campaign has the right amount of challenge and levels. forcing the player to think outside the box and change up their ships or optimize micro managing. haven't tried the multiplayer yet. I'm kinda late to the party here. but seeing how you can use AI is really cool. program a ship to prioritize certain tactics in a battle. 1 minor complaint is that you can't add any of the dlc items to your ships in the campaign mode. I can understand some of the shaded stuff, but the insignia's and stripes to make your ships more unique? That should be changed. Also its kinda hard to keep ships symmetrical.