Reviews

• gamedeal user

  Nov 2, 2021

  DO NOT BUY, NOT SUPPORTED ANYMORE OR BEING FIXED. CAN'T WORKSHOP OR ANYTHING WISH I COULD REFUND its a money grab, devs random say they doing stuff to keep in store and pretend game is current. stop paying for thier vacation homes
• gamedeal user

  Nov 14, 2021

  just freezes my computer every time its dumb
• gamedeal user

  Nov 20, 2021

  cute animations
• gamedeal user

  Mar 22, 2022

  I see people saying this is a money grab... For 3.99? Seriously? This thing cost less than a cheesburger =/. You get decent 3d Models with great movement ( though weird movement at times) and multiple Models. Be it for general purpose use or the NSFW aspect 3.99 is fine. They say its been abandoned... honestly I don't know if it has. I got it like a few months ago and barely use it. I personally likeit because I know there are people out there that are doing the Deskmate thing like Oska did way back when and I have wanted that type of program for my computer for a long while. Right now this i the closest thing to it ( that I know of) and I might be able to learn something from it and expand upon the idea myself. Simply put if you want it... get it. If its doesn't work Refund it. But... as of this review... it's only $3.99... and its not on sale. =/ To me that sound like the devs want to do more but can't and know the audience would not be happy if they where asking for like $10-$15 to fund them. People who buy stuff often time have no idea how much work goes into this stuff. I watched someone scripting in blender on twitch. Crap gets complicated. And it been seriously dumbed down for people who want to create but not have to dig through God knows how much lines of code for one issue.
• gamedeal user

  Jan 23, 2021

  This comment maybe more subjective than objective point of view but that doesn't matter It looks like there have been few comments at the time i write comments in English so i am gladly to be one of them. A next generation from the old software DME (desktop magic engine) with the name desktopMMD3 in order to boost sales, it will not be a big deal but since the advertise mentioned about brand new rendering engine and no skirt clipping, many have expected the improvement in the physical movement but until now there is nothing change for the any PME format style models. If it only about this particular model named Miss Fish then this software clearly already achieved its goal but unfortunately for most anime fan this put them in nothing more than disappointment and resentment about this software (maybe only me). Just like its former generation DME (or DMMD2 however you refer it) there are only few changes compared to the old ones. I don't know about the others but personally when i launch my own model it looks somewhat weird and bizarre, it gives me chill to my spinal core whenever i see my beloved one doesn't even look like any MMD in the youtube. Her eyes become even bigger than the usual and whenever her eyes blink I notices her entire also blink too, this doesnt affect much on Miss Fish and yet the difference become more distinct when you used different models. Overall, I believe this one like DME should labeled as EARLY ACCESS in order to not mislead people but whatever. This software is borrowing the positive review from the old ones for getting more sales but in reality the developers just sell it under another name to satisfy their greed. Despite of having several months there is still no significant improvement in physical collision. The previous version DesktopMMD1 (version 1.6 or 1.7) really manage good physical rendering effect and compared to the current version DMM2 and DMM3 are no matched in how they render model's movement. What a great disappointment
• gamedeal user

  Jan 23, 2021

  Re-releasing this won't make it more popular and alienate current fanbase. Previous (Desktop Magic Engine) was far from done, and now abandoned. Most of submissions in workshop had serious compatibility issues (see-through textures, clipping, animation on certain type of models), some outright not working. If you can't make it work properly, you should at least provide proper tools to allow anyone make quality submissions. Now without certain few people who can do it right, this would be a garbage software. Basically the same with a couple of new tricks. Don't see why this couldn't be a regular update to previous one.
• gamedeal user

  Jan 26, 2021

  Very epic and good. Contains anime boobie
• metlar78

  Mar 6, 2021

  Its a fun little desktop item very entertaining and people are so creative out there a chance to see some very creative art
• gamedeal user

  Mar 28, 2021

  I'm going to be brutally real with y'all, and be more "informative" than my other Steam reviews. This should [i]not[/i] have been a separate product. It should've been an update to something previous. I've seen the developer state that it's a major update, and that's why it's a separate application. To me, that's not entirely valid. Making this an update with a [i]price increase[/i] would've been the better choice in my opinion. As an example, I bought Marmoset Hexels 3 when it was Marmoset Hexels 2. It had an update and a price increase for [i]future purchases[/i]. I did not have to spend money for this upgrade, and I still genuinely like the program and how they made it. The only disadvantage to this is that people can't buy the older version, but at this point it would've been an older, unsupported version of the fundamentally same program. I feel like this is would've been a smarter action to take for these series of programs. I feel like Desktop Magic Engine (fundamentally Desktop MMD 2) could've just gotten an update like this program. They share a very similar interface, and it's painfully obvious to me that these are more or less "copy-and-paste" programs, with more shiny features to make purchasing sound more reasonable. I understand the existence of DME (DMMD 2) as the first DMMD was taken off of Steam for a module that was originally released under no license and given a license to revoke usage for commercial purposes (by the way, this is completely reasonable to do and doesn't violate anything) and the developer of the module complained to Valve. So a re-release without that exact module (or the same module if a settlement was made for use with or without compensation) makes sense. However, I don't fully agree with how the developer handled it. For a re-release, giving out a free key is something other developers do but admittedly not all. One example is when Klei Entertainment remastered [i]Mark of the Ninja[/i]. They initially gave owners of the original game a free copy of the remaster, but I didn't notice until I came across it (I assume that I missed an announcement, I'm not sure.) In my opinion, this could have been handled a lot better. I don't agree with the developer's rebuttal of this on other reviews, and it seems like that it's something cookie-cutter. You could've handled this better, mate.